Matching & Cost Sharing in Federal Grants: How to Stay Compliant
Oct 6
/
Rachel Werner
If you’ve ever applied for a federal grant, chances are you’ve seen the words “matching” or “cost sharing” pop up in the application. At first glance, it sounds straightforward: your organization contributes financial or in-kind resources to a project to supplement the federal funding. In some cases this is required, but some entities (particularly state and local government agencies) utilize this cost share for each grant. But in practice, this is one of the most common areas where grantees stumble — and the consequences of mistakes can be costly.
Cost sharing (matching) means your organization is committing to use non-federal resources to support the program. This contribution can come in many forms, like cash from your own funds, a private donation, or even in-kind contributions such as donated goods, services, or volunteer hours. However, once you commit to providing a cost share, it’s no longer optional. It becomes a binding part of your award.
Cost sharing (matching) means your organization is committing to use non-federal resources to support the program. This contribution can come in many forms, like cash from your own funds, a private donation, or even in-kind contributions such as donated goods, services, or volunteer hours. However, once you commit to providing a cost share, it’s no longer optional. It becomes a binding part of your award.
Understanding What Counts
One of the biggest challenges with cost sharing is knowing what actually qualifies. Federal dollars can’t be used to meet a matching requirement unless the Notice of Funding Opportunity specifically says so. That means you can’t double-dip by using one federal grant to cover another’s cost share. Your documentation has to be airtight too. Every donation, staff hour, or piece of equipment you count toward the cost share must be properly recorded and backed up.
The most common pitfall? Over-promising. Some organizations commit to a higher cost share in the hope of making their application more competitive, only to find themselves scrambling later when they can’t fulfill the obligation. Others run into trouble by failing to track match contributions as carefully as federal dollars, which can lead to findings in an audit.
The safest approach is to be realistic and precise, and to communicate with your finance team on what is feasible. Commit only what you can sustain and make sure your accounting system has a clear way to track match contributions in real time. Train staff so they understand what qualifies, and double-check that your match sources are allowable before including them in your proposal.
The most common pitfall? Over-promising. Some organizations commit to a higher cost share in the hope of making their application more competitive, only to find themselves scrambling later when they can’t fulfill the obligation. Others run into trouble by failing to track match contributions as carefully as federal dollars, which can lead to findings in an audit.
The safest approach is to be realistic and precise, and to communicate with your finance team on what is feasible. Commit only what you can sustain and make sure your accounting system has a clear way to track match contributions in real time. Train staff so they understand what qualifies, and double-check that your match sources are allowable before including them in your proposal.
The Bottom Line
Ultimately, cost sharing isn't about adding pressure — it’s about showing your investment in the program. With careful planning and strong documentation, you can meet the requirement confidently and avoid unnecessary compliance headaches.
Want to go deeper? Our grant management courses and webinars include practical tools for building and documenting risk assessments that meet Uniform Guidance expectations—helping your team reduce risk and strengthen compliance.
Want to go deeper? Our grant management courses and webinars include practical tools for building and documenting risk assessments that meet Uniform Guidance expectations—helping your team reduce risk and strengthen compliance.
Copyright © 2024 MyFedTrainer | All Rights Reserved
Martha A Moore, MPA, DTM, CNAP, has been working in the accounting industry for over 35 years. Over that time, she has worked in the Grants Management area for 20 years. She has recently received the Certified Nonprofit Accounting Professional (CNAP) credentials. Martha’s expertise in grants management field is in the post-award/closing/audit areas, while serving as an advisor to preaward budgeting and program narrative. Thanks to her many years in the accounting/grants management industry, Martha has the ability to zoom out and holistically see the big picture and how external funding can be crafted for effective and efficient use. She believes in team approach with both finance and program team at the table to ensure a clear and comprehensive award application, with the end goal being grant awards. Martha also has extensive experience in subaward management from a university to a local nonprofit organization. Martha is a public speaker and trainer, thanks to her many years (20+) in Toastmasters International. She earned the highest designation, Distinguished Toastmaster, and puts those skills to use daily. Martha’s niche’ is the desire to see local nonprofits (BIPOC startups to mature nonprofits) succeed in securing funding to fulfill community gaps in partnership with the philanthropists, private sectors, local, state, and federal governments.

